Payment System Competitiveness

Authors

  • Frantisek Bartes Brno University of Technology
  • Jitka Studenikova Brno University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2010.027

Keywords:

interchange fee, Tourist Test, cards payment, direct debit system, information asymmetry

Abstract

Competitiveness is one of the key conditions of functional market system. With the time passing, people changed their understanding of economic systems, from barter to paper money. In nowadays world, when the IT becomes a big part of common life, the electronic money, e-purses, pay pall and other payment systems are more used and important. The payment systems differ one from each other and we can talk about payment instruments market. But what if this market does not work well. The aim of this article is to find out the rules, conditions on the market of payment instruments. The author tries to recognize the problems on the demand and supply side. The system of credit cards and direct debit system is involved the most, together with latest theory of Tourist Test. The Interchange Fee plays the key role.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARTES, F. Strategie konkurenčních střetů. 1. vyd. Brno, FP VUT v Brně, 1999.
European Central Bank (2009) Oversight framework for direct debit schemes. European Central Bank, ISBN 978-899-0458-2.
European Commission. (2007) Antitrust: Commission prohibits MasterCard's intra-EEA Multilateral Interchange Fees, IP/07/1959, Brussels, 19, http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/1959.
European Commission. (2008) Antitrust: Commission initiates formal proceedings against Visa Europe Limited, MEMO/08/170, Brussels, 26,
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/08/170&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Article 81 of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, European Commission.
Baxter, W.P. (1983)?Bank Interchange of Transactional Paper: Legal Perspectives?, Journal of Law and Economics, 26.
Belguim, Banque Nationale de Belgique. (2005). "Co?ts, avantages et inconvénients des différents moyens de paiement", Belguim, Banque Nationale de Belgique.
European Commission. (2002). Commission exempts multilateral interchange fees for cross-border Visa card payments, Belgium,
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/02/1138&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
Farrell, J. (2006). ?Efficiency and Competition between Payment Instruments?, Review of Network Economics, 5(1).
Katz, Michael L. (2005). ?Commentary: What do we know about interchange fees and what does it mean for public policy?? in Interchange Fees in Credit and Debit Card Networks: What Role for Public Authorities? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, http://www.kansascityfed.org/PUBLICAT/PSR/Proceedings/2005/katz.pdf.
Office of Competition and Consumers? Protection, Department of International Relations and Communication. (2007). Unlawful practices of banks, Poland, http://www.uokik.gov.pl/en/press_office/press_releases/art72.html.
Rochet, Jean-Charles and Jean Tirole. (2002). ?Cooperation among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations,? RAND Journal of Economics, 33.
Rochet, J.C. and J. Tirole. (2006). "Must-Take Cards and the Tourist Test", IDEI discussion paper, Toulouse University.
Schmalensee, R. (2003). ?Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets,? Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4).
United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. (2006). CREDIT CARDS Increased Complexity in Rates and Fees Heightens Need for More Effective Disclosures to Consumers, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06929.pdf.
Wright, J. (2003). ?Pricing in Debit and Credit Card Schemes,? Economics Letters, 80.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2010

Issue

Section

Financial Markets of Central Europe

How to Cite

Bartes, F., & Studenikova, J. (2010). Payment System Competitiveness. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 5(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2010.027

Similar Articles

1-10 of 241

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.