Asymmetry and convergence in the development of digital technologies in the EU countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.022Keywords:
EU, digitalization, digital gap, digital technologies, convergence, digital strategy, competitivenessAbstract
Research background: Digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated significantly across Europe, including in regions that are at the stage of catch-up development. However, as innovative technologies are intensively integrated into everyday life, the digital gap between the EU countries is increasing. The widening digital gap is becoming a serious threat to achieving the EU's sustainable development goals and building a sustainable European society.
Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article was to empirically substantiate the inclusiveness and convergence of the digital strategy in the EU countries.
Methods: Using the method of fuzzy sets, the level of asymmetry in access to transactional (e-commerce), information (cloud computing), operational (artificial intelligence) technologies in the EU countries was assessed. The negative impact of the digital gap within the countries (the gap between small, medium, large companies) and the global digital gap (the gap between EU countries) on the competitiveness of countries was established, for which correlation analysis and the Granger causality test were used.
Findings & value added: The findings of this study contribute to the literature of digital transformation and digital gap of European countries. The impact of the digital gap in transactional, information, operational technologies on the competitiveness of countries is differentiated depending on the level of digitalization of the country. Cluster groups of countries are determined by the convergence of digitalization and ways to ensure long-term competitiveness. The directions for reducing the digital gap in the EU countries are substantiated by changing the priorities of spending on innovation and increasing productivity, diversifying the digital technologies used. The empirical results obtained can serve as a basis for improving the effectiveness of the digitalization policy in the EU countries in accordance with individual convergence goals. The main added value of the paper is related to the presented research procedure, which can be used in analyses of digital technologies development also for other countries. The results provide valuable insights into evaluating the digital technologies in European countries.
Downloads
References
Acılar, A., Koca, G., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2011). Digital divide among enterprises in a developing country. International Journal of Ebusiness and Egovernment Studies, 3, 2.
View in Google Scholar
Adamek, J., & Solarz, M. (2023). Adoption factors in digital lending services offered by FinTech lenders. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 169–212.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.005
View in Google Scholar
Akande, A., Cabral, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). Assessing the gap between technology and the environmental sustainability of European Cities. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 581–604.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09903-3
View in Google Scholar
Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2022). Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology. Technology in Society, 68, 101896.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101896
View in Google Scholar
Appiah-Otoo, I., & Song, N. (2021). The impact of ICT on economic growth-comparing rich and poor countries. Telecommunications Policy, 45(1), 102082.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102082
View in Google Scholar
Bickley, S. J., Macintyre, A., & Torgler, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship. CREMA Working Paper Series, 2021b-11.
View in Google Scholar
Bonsón, E., Lavorato, D., Lamboglia, R., & Mancini, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence activities and ethical approaches in leading listed companies in the European Union. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 43, 100535.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100535
View in Google Scholar
Brunet-Thornton, R., Cramer, T., & Jirsák, P. (2019). A research agenda on Czech attitudinal perspectives in an era of digital transformation. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 6(1), 99–112.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v6i1.277
View in Google Scholar
Carlsson, V., & Rönnblom, M. (2022). From politics to ethics: Transformations in EU policies on digital technology. Technology in Society, 71, 102145.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102145
View in Google Scholar
Civelek, M., Krajčík, V., & Ključnikov, A. (2023). The impacts of dynamic capabilities on SMEs’ digital transformation process: The resource-based view perspective. Oeconomia Copernicana. Advance online publication. 10.24136/oc.2023.019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.019
View in Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. J. L., Weathington, B. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2013). Understanding and conducting research in the health sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118643624
View in Google Scholar
Dondapati, A., Sheoliha, N., Panduro-Ramirez, J., Bakhare, R., Sreejith, P. M., & Devi Prasad Kotni, V. V. (2022). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge production and B2B marketing rational analysis for enhancing business performance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 4, 2232–2235.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.557
View in Google Scholar
European Commission (2022). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/connectivity.
View in Google Scholar
Eurostat (2022a). Database. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/ data/database.
View in Google Scholar
Eurostat (2022b). Structural business statistics overview. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Structural_bus iness_statistics_overview.
View in Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
View in Google Scholar
Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2018). Studying confgurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 18(3), 482–495.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487
View in Google Scholar
Gavkalova, N., Kolupaieva, I., & Barka, Z. M. (2017). Analysis of the efficiency of levers in the context of implementation of the state regulatory policy. Economic Annals-XXI, 165(5-6), 41–46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-09
View in Google Scholar
Guo, C., & Wan, B. (2022). The digital divide in online learning in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 71, 102122.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102122
View in Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
View in Google Scholar
Hallward-Driemeier, M., Nayyar, G., Fengler, W., Aridi, A., Gill, I., & Aridi, A. (2020). Europe 4.0: Addressing the digital dilemma. Washington, DC: World Bank..
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/34746
View in Google Scholar
Hung, B. Q., Nham, N. T. H., & Ha, L. T. (2023). The importance of digitalization in powering environmental innovation performance of European countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100284
View in Google Scholar
Krawczak, M., & Szkatuła, G. (2020). On matching of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 517, 254–274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.11.050
View in Google Scholar
Kučera, J., & Fiľa, M. (2022). R&D expenditure, innovation performance and economic development of the EU countries. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 227–241.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(14)
View in Google Scholar
Liao, S.-C., Chou, T.-C., & Huang, C.-H. (2022). Revisiting the development trajectory of the digital divide: A main path analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121607.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121607
View in Google Scholar
Liu, M., Li, C., Wang, S., & Li, Q. (2023). Digital transformation, risk-taking, and innovation: Evidence from data on listed enterprises in China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100332.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100332
View in Google Scholar
Luo, Y., Cui, H., Zhong, H., & Wei, C. (2023). Business environment and enterprise digital transformation. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104250
View in Google Scholar
Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
View in Google Scholar
Ma, T., Zhang, S., Zhu, S., Ni, J., Wu, Q., & Liu, M. (2022). The new role of nursing in digital inclusion: Reflections on smartphone use and willingness to increase digital skills among Chinese older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 48, 118–126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.09.004
View in Google Scholar
Malkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosala, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: Insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 325–355.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.012
View in Google Scholar
Marhraoui, M. A. (2023). Digital skills for project managers: A systematic literature Review. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1591–1598.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.451
View in Google Scholar
Marti, L., & Puertas, R. (2023). Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level. Technology in Society, 72, 102206.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102206
View in Google Scholar
Megits, N., Neskorodieva, I., & Schuster, J. (2020). Impact assessment of the COVID-19 on trade between Eastern Europe and China. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 7(3), 385–399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i3.579
View in Google Scholar
Nadoleanu, G., Stăiculescu, A. R., & Bran, E. (2022). The multifaceted challenges of the digital transformation: Creating a sustainable society. Postmodern Openings, 13, 300–316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/428
View in Google Scholar
Nosratabadi, S., Atobishi, T., & Hegedűs, S. (2023). Social sustainability of digital transformation: Empirical evidence from EU-27 countries. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050126
View in Google Scholar
Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera, G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of service innovation confgurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134–149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513513337
View in Google Scholar
Pappas, I. O. (2018). User experience in personalized online shopping: A fuzzy-set analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(7/8), 1679–1703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2017-0707
View in Google Scholar
Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794–803.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010
View in Google Scholar
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
View in Google Scholar
Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2022). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
View in Google Scholar
Pliskin, N., Levy, M., Heart, T., O’Flaherty, B., & O’Dea, P. (2006). The corporate digital divide between smaller and larger firms. In E. M. Trauth, D. Howcroft, T. Butler, B. Fitzgerald & J. I. DeGross (Eds). Social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems. (pp. 413–417). Boston: Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34588-4_27
View in Google Scholar
Polozova, T., Kolupaieva, I., & Sheiko, I. (2021). Digital gap in EU countries and its impact on labour productivity and global competitiveness. In Hradec economic days, part 1 (pp. 569–570). Hradec Králové: University of Hradec Králové.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2021-01-065
View in Google Scholar
PwC (2012). Maximizing the impact of digitization. Retrieved from https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/reports/2011-2014/maximizing-impac t-digitization.html.
View in Google Scholar
Rajbhandari, A., & Zhang, F. (2021). Does energy efficiency promote economic growth? Evidence from a multi-country and multi-sector panel data set. World Bank Group.
View in Google Scholar
Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4), e14878.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878
View in Google Scholar
Sánchez-Torres, J. A. (2019). Moderating effect of the digital divide of e-commerce. International Journal of Social Economics, 46, 12, 1387–1400.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2018-0622
View in Google Scholar
Schmitt, A. K., Grawe, A., & Woodside, A. G. (2017). Illustrating the power of fsQCA in explaining paradoxical consumer environmental orientations. Psychology & Marketing, 34(3), 323–334.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20991
View in Google Scholar
Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
View in Google Scholar
Skare, M., & Riberio Soriano, D. (2021). How globalization is changing digital technology adoption: An international perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 222–233.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.04.001
View in Google Scholar
Sun, C., Lin, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vincúrová, Z. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1081–1116.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.031
View in Google Scholar
Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochozka, M. ., & Vozňáková, I. (2022). Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China’s Ashare listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(3), 783–829.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.023
View in Google Scholar
The World Bank Group (2020). Europe 4.0: Addressing Europe's digital dilemma. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/publication/addressi ng-europes-digital-dilemma.
View in Google Scholar
Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2022). Business digital maturity in Europe and its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, 1, 27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010027
View in Google Scholar
Ulas, D. (2019). Digital transformation process and SMEs. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 662–671.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.101
View in Google Scholar
Van Kessel, R., Wong, B .L. H., Rubinić, I., O’Nuallain, E., & Czabanowska, K. (2022). Is Europe prepared to go digital? Making the case for developing digital capacity: An exploratory analysis of Eurostat survey data. PLOS Digit Health, 1(2), e0000013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000013
View in Google Scholar
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
View in Google Scholar
Woodside, A. G. (2017). The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications. Berlin: Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47028-3
View in Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (2022). 70% of homes in the EU have high-speed internet – but a digital divide persists. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/ 2022/09/eu-high-speed-internet-digital-divide/.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
