Endogenous money supply, global liquidity and financial transactions: Panel evidence from OECD countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.004Keywords:
endogenous money supply, domestic credit, global liquidity, financial transactions, quantity theory of creditAbstract
Research background: Endogenous money creation is an inherent feature of today?s economies and widely accepted phenomenon. As the various theories of money rely on the money quantity equation, most empirical research is heading towards the analysis of the two-way relationship between the quantity of money and nominal GDP. In today's world, with the extraordinary development of the financial sector, money is used not only for transactions in the real economy, but increasingly also for purchasing financial assets. This observation was absorbed by Werner in the quantity theory of disaggregated credit.
Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to join the debate on endogenous character of money supply by tasting a disaggregated equation of money. It assumes that the domestic money supply is positively determined not only by growth in GDP-based transactions but also by growth in non-GDP-based transactions (financial transactions). Additionally, it is assumed that in the age of globalization it can be also positively influenced by the global liquidity.
Methods: Testing of the above-mentioned hypotheses takes place with the use of panel unit roots tests, panel Granger causality test and panel estimations (OLS, models with fixed/random effects, GMM). In the study, annual data from 2002 to 2018 for OECD countries were chosen for statistical research.
Findings & value added: The article confirms the hypothesis that real and financial economic activity together with global liquidity positively influence domestic credit and thus money supply. As the amount of money in an economy is driven not only by the real economy but also by the financial economy, prudential regulations that restrict leverage (and thus control the amount of credit) and limit risk-taking during price bubbles periods should be therefore considered. In the research, the reaction of domestic money supply to the changes in US money supply is positive. It confirms the importance of spill-over effect of expansionary policy in major economies to other economies.
Downloads
References
Allen, F., Beck, T., Carletti, E., Lane, Ph., Schoenmaker, D., & Wagner, W. (2011). Cross-border banking in Europe: Implications for financial stability and mac-roeconomic policies. Center for Economic Policy Research. Retrieved from https://www.uvm.edu/~sgedeon/summer2012/Allen_2011.pdf (10.10.2021).
View in Google Scholar
Altissimo, F., Georgiou, E., Sastre, T., Valderrama, M. T., Sterne, G., Stocker, M., Weth, M., Whelan, K., & Willman, A. (2005). Wealth and asset price effects on economic activity. ECB Occasional Paper, 29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.752089
View in Google Scholar
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Econom-ic Studies, 58(2), 277?297. doi: 10.2307/2297968.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
View in Google Scholar
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable esti-mation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29?51. doi: 10.101 6/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
View in Google Scholar
Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2006). The nature and role of monetary policy when money is endogenous. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(6), 847?860. doi: 10.109 3/cje/bel023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bel023
View in Google Scholar
Asriyan, V., Fornaro, L., Martin, A., & Ventura, J. (2021). Monetary policy for a bubbly world. Review of Economic Studies, 88(3), 1418?1456. doi: 10.1093/restud/ rdaa045.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa045
View in Google Scholar
Baba, B., & Sevil, G. (2020). The impact of foreign capital shifts on economic activi-ties and asset prices: A threshold VAR approach. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 4(3), 87?104. doi: 10.1108/AJEB-06-2020-0013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-06-2020-0013
View in Google Scholar
Badarudin, Z. E., Ariff, M., & Khalid, A.M. (2013). Post-Keynesian money endoge-neity evidence in G7 economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 33(C), 146?162. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.11.014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.11.014
View in Google Scholar
Baks, K., & Kramer C. (1999). Global liquidity and asset prices: measurement, implications and spillovers. IMF Working Papers, 1999/168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451858242.001
View in Google Scholar
Balatti, M., Brooks, C., Clements, M. P., & Kappou, K. (2016). Did quantitative easing only inflate stock prices? Macroeconomic evidence from the US and UK. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2838128.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2838128
View in Google Scholar
Baumeister, Ch., & Benati, L. (2012). Unconventional monetary policy and the Great Recession: Estimating the macroeconomic effects of a spread compres-sion at the zero lower bound. Bank of Canada Working Paper, 2012-21.
View in Google Scholar
Beckmann, J., Gern, K. J., & Jannsen, N. (2022). Should they stay or should they go? Negative interest rate policies under review. International Economics and Economic Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10368-022-00547-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-022-00547-4
View in Google Scholar
Belke, A., Orth, W., & Setzer, R. (2009). Liquidity and the dynamic pattern of asset price adjustment: a global view. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/eco/43 687355.pdf (10.08.2020).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1496862
View in Google Scholar
Bernanke, B. S., & Kuttner, K. N. (2005). What explains the stock market's reaction to Federal Reserve policy? Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1221?1257. doi: 10.1111/j.15 40-6261.2005.00760.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00760.x
View in Google Scholar
Bernanke, B. S. (2017). Federal reserve policy in an international context. IMF Economic Review, 65, 1?3. doi: 10.1057/imfer.2016.8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2016.8
View in Google Scholar
Bertaut, C., von Beschwitz, B., & Curcuru, S. (2021). The international role of the US dollar. FEDS Notes. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Re-serve System, October 06, 2021. doi: org/10.17016/2380-7172.2998.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/2380-7172.2998
View in Google Scholar
Buch, C., Vogel, E., & Weigert, B. (2018). Evaluating macroprudential policies. ESBR Working Paper Series, 76. doi: 10.2849/7546.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3723424
View in Google Scholar
Burns, A., Kida, M., Lim, J. J., Mohapatra S., & Stocker, M. (2014). Unconventional monetary policy normalization in high-income countries: Implications for emerging market capital flows and crisis risks. Policy Research Working Paper 6830. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-6830.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6830
View in Google Scholar
Butt, N., Churm, R., McMahon, M. F., Morotz, A., & Schanz, J. F. (2015). QE and the bank lending channel in the United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1258.pdf (20.11.2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2673293
View in Google Scholar
Carrera, C., Gondo, R., Forero, F. P., & Ramirez-Rondan, N. (2016). Effects of the U.S. quantitative easing over a small open economy. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/ events/ccaconf2014/carrera.pdf (30.11.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Černohorská, L. (2018). Endogeneity of money: The case of Czech Republic. Journal of International Studies, 11(4), 155?168. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-4/11
View in Google Scholar
Chai, H. Y., & Hahn, S. B. (2018). Does monetary policy regime determine the nature of the money supply? Evidence from seven countries in the Asia-Pacific region. East Asian Economic Review, 22(2), 217?239. doi: 10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018 .22.2.343.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018.22.2.343
View in Google Scholar
Chen, Q., Filardo, A., He, D., & Zhu, F. (2016). Financial crisis, US unconventional monetary policy and international spillovers. Journal of International Money and Finance, 67, 62?81. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2015.06.011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2015.06.011
View in Google Scholar
Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249?272. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
View in Google Scholar
Clark, T. S., & Linzer, D. A. (2015). Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 399?408. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2014.32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.32
View in Google Scholar
Cova P., Pagano P., & Pisani M., (2019). Domestic and international effects of the eurosystem expanded asset purchase programme: A structural model based analysis. IMF Economic Review, 67(2), 315?348. doi: 10.1057/s41308-018-0071-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-018-0071-7
View in Google Scholar
Daripa, A., & Varotto, S. (2010). Ex ante versus ex post regulation of bank capi-tal. In L. P. Blenman, H. A. Black & E. J. Kane (Eds.). Banking and capital markets: New international perspectives (pp. 29?58). Singapore: World Scientific Publish-ing Company.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814273619_0002
View in Google Scholar
Davidson, P., & Weintraub, S. (1973). Money as cause and effect. Economic Journal, 83(332), 1117?1132. doi: 10.2307/2230844.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2230844
View in Google Scholar
Davis, G. F., & Kim, S. (2015). Financialization of the economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 203?221. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112402.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112402
View in Google Scholar
Davis, J. S., & Devereux, M. B. (2019). Capital controls as macro-prudential policy in a large open economy. NBER Working Paper, 25710. doi: 10.3386/w25710.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25710
View in Google Scholar
Deleidi, M., & Levrero, E. S. (2017). The money creation process: A theoretical and empirical analysis for the United States. Metroeconomica, International Review of Economics, 70(4), 552?586. doi: 10.1111/meca.12238.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12238
View in Google Scholar
Dong, F., Miao, J., & Wang, P. (2020). Asset bubbles and monetary policy. Review of Economic Dynamics, 37, S68?S98. doi: 10.1016/j.red.2020.06.003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2020.06.003
View in Google Scholar
EBC (2010). Enhancing monetary analysis. European Central Bank.
View in Google Scholar
Economic Affairs Department (2012). The interaction between the financial sys-tem and the real economy. Report from the Economic Affairs Department at the Ministry of Finance. Retrieved from https://www.government.se/49b745/conte ntas-sets/854ee6afbbc94f78bf1e0bbd0401407d/the-interaction-between-the-financ ial-system-and-the-real-economy (20.10.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Edwards, S. (1999). How effective are capital controls? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 65?84. doi: 10.1257/jep.13.4.65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.13.4.65
View in Google Scholar
Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F.S. (1997). Is there a role for monetary aggregates in the conduct of monetary policy? Journal of Monetary Economics, 40, 279?304. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00044-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00044-5
View in Google Scholar
Eviews (2014). EViews 8.1. User guide II. Retrieved from http://www.eviews. com/EViews8/EViews8/EViews%208%20Users%20Guide%20II.pdf (10.03.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Fabo, B., Jančoková, M., Kempf, E., & Pástor, Ľ. (2021). Fifty shades of QE: Compar-ing findings of central bankers and academics. Journal of Monetary Economics, 120, 1?20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.04.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.04.001
View in Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1911, [1963]). The purchasing power of money. New York: Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar
Fontana, G., Realfonzo, R., & Passarella, M. V. (2020). Monetary economics after the global financial crisis: What has happened to the endogenous money theo-ry? European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 17(3), 339?355. doi: 10.4337/ejeep.2020.0056.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2020.0056
View in Google Scholar
Fratcher, M., Lo Duca, M., & Starub, R. (2013). On the international spillovers of U.S. quantitative easing. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1557.
View in Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1969). Factors affecting the level of interest rates. In Proceeding of the 1968 conference on saving and residential financing (pp. 11?27). Chicago: United States Saving and Loan League.
View in Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970). The counter-revolution in monetary theory. IEA Occasional Paper, 33.
View in Google Scholar
Friedman, B. M., & Kuttner, K. N. (1996). A price target for U.S. monetary policy? Lessons from the 15 experience with money growth targets. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 77?146. doi: 10.2307/2534647.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2534647
View in Google Scholar
Frost, J., Ito, H., & Van Stralen, R. (2020). The effectiveness of macroprudential policies and capital controls against volatile capital inflows. DNB Working Pa-per, 686.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623036
View in Google Scholar
Furceri, D., Guichard, S., & Rusticelli, E. (2012). Episodes of large capital inflows, banking and currency crises, and sudden stops. International Finance, 15(1), 1?35, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2362.2012.01296.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2362.2012.01296.x
View in Google Scholar
Gerding, E. F. (2013). Law, bubbles, and financial regulation. Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885049
View in Google Scholar
Giansante, S., Fatouh, M., & Ongena, S. (2019). Does quantitative easing boost bank lending to the real economy or cause other bank asset reallocation? The case of the UK. The Case of the UK (August 18, 2019). Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, 19?72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446293
View in Google Scholar
Goodhardt, Ch., & Hoffmann, B. (2008). House prices, money, credit, and the macroeconomy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 180?205. doi: 10.1093 /oxrep/grn009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn009
View in Google Scholar
Gordon, D. B., & Leeper, E. M. (2006). The price level, the quantity theory of mon-ey and the fiscal theory of the price level. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(1), 4?27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2006.00368.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2006.00368.x
View in Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relationship by econometric models and cross section special methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424?438. doi: 10.2307/1912791.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
View in Google Scholar
Greenspan, A. (2013). The map and the territory: Risk, human nature, and the future of forecasting. Penguin Press.
View in Google Scholar
Gros, D., Aldici, C., & De Groen, W. P. (2015). Lessons from quantitative easing: Much ado about so little? CEPS Policy Brief, 330.
View in Google Scholar
Gupta, P. (2016). Capital flows and central banking: The Indian experience. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 7569.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7569
View in Google Scholar
Haldane, A., Roberts-Sklar, M., Young, C., & Wieladek, T. (2016). QE: the story so far. Bank of England Working Paper 624. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2858204.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2858204
View in Google Scholar
Hanke, M., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., & Sutter, M. (2010). The economic consequences of a Tobin tax?an experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1-2), 58?71. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.004
View in Google Scholar
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46, 1251?1271. doi: 10.2307/1913827.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
View in Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1933). Monetary theory and the trade cycle. London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences.
View in Google Scholar
Hook, A. (2022). Examining modern money creation: An institution-centered ex-planation and visualization of the ?credit theory? of money and some reflec-tions on its significance. Journal of Economic Education, 53(3), 210?231. doi: 10.1080/002204 85.2022.2075510.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2022.2075510
View in Google Scholar
Hsiao, Ch. (2022). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057745
View in Google Scholar
Huber, J. (2020). The hemispheres of finance: GDP and non-GDP finance. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3734917.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3734917
View in Google Scholar
Hudepohl, T., van Lamoen, R., & de Vette, N. (2021). Quantitative easing and exu-berance in stock markets: Evidence from the euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 118(C), doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102471.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102471
View in Google Scholar
Ibarra, R., & Tellez-Leon, I. E. (2020). Are all types of capital flows driven by the same factors? Evidence from Mexico. Empirical Economics, 59(1), 461?502. doi: 10.1007/s00181-019-01624-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01624-5
View in Google Scholar
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 115, 53?74. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03) 00092-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
View in Google Scholar
IMF (2013). The interaction of monetary and macroprudential policies. Interna-tional Monetary Fund, retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/ 012913.pdf (08.10.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1970). The new monetarism. Lloyds Bank Review, 97, 1?17.
View in Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1982). The scourge of monetarism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1930). Treatise on money. London: MacMillan.
View in Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar
Kim, S., & Yang D. Y. (2011). The impact of capital inflows on asset prices in emerging Asian economies: Is too much money chasing too little good? Open Economy Review, 22, 293?315. doi: 10.1007/s11079-009-9124-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-009-9124-x
View in Google Scholar
Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modelling. London: Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209366
View in Google Scholar
Lane, P. R., & McQuade, P. (2014). Domestic credit growth and international capital flows. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(1), 218?252. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12038.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12038
View in Google Scholar
Lavoie, M. (2019). Advances in the post-Keynesian analysis of money and finance. In P. Arestis & M. Sawyer (Eds.). Frontiers of heterodox macroeconomics (pp. 89?129). Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23929-9_3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23929-9_3
View in Google Scholar
Lavoie, M., & Fiebiger, B. (2018). Unconventional monetary policies, with a focus on quantitative easing. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 15(2), 139?146. doi: 10.4337/ejeep.2018.0037.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2018.0037
View in Google Scholar
Le Bourva, J. (1992). Money creation and credit multipliers. Review of Political Economy, 4(4), 447?466. doi: 10.1080/09538259200000029.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259200000029
View in Google Scholar
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1?24. doi: 10.1016/S0 304-4076(01)00098-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
View in Google Scholar
Lopreite, M. (2012). The endogenous money hypothesis: An empirical study of the Euro Area (1999-2010). SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2084197.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2084197
View in Google Scholar
Lyonnet, V., & Werner, R. (2012). Lessons from the Bank of England on ?quantita-tive easing? and other ?unconventional? monetary policies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25, 94?105. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2012.08.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.08.001
View in Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631?652. doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
View in Google Scholar
Martin, A., & Ventura, J. (2018). The macroeconomics of rational bubbles: A user's guide. Annual Review of Economics, 10, 505?539. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053534.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053534
View in Google Scholar
McCallum, B. T., & Nelson, E. (2010). Money and inflation: Some critical issues. In B. M. Friedman & M. Woodford (Ed.). Handbook of monetary economics, edition 1, volume 3 (pp. 97?153). Elsevier.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53238-1.00003-X
View in Google Scholar
Miao, J., & Wang, P. (2018). Asset bubbles and credit constraints. American Economic Review, 108(9), 2590?2628. doi: 10.1257/aer.20160782.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160782
View in Google Scholar
Minsky H. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1983). Unpacking the post Keynesian black box: Bank lending and the money supply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5(4), 537?556. doi: 10.1080 /01603477.1983.11489391.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1983.11489391
View in Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1988). Horizontalists and verticalists: The macroeconomics of credit money, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Moran, M., & Flaherty, E. (2022). Rethinking the concept of a ?financial elite?: A critical intervention. Critical Sociology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177 /08969205221143317.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221143317
View in Google Scholar
Mušinský, T., & Siničáková, M. (2020). Endogeneity of money and non-conventional single monetary policy in the context of ongoing crisis in three Central European countries. In Proceedings of FIKUSZ symposium for young re-searchers (pp. 55?66). Óbuda University Keleti Károly Faculty of Economics.
View in Google Scholar
Nayan, S., Kadir, N., Abdullah, M. S., & Ahamad, M. (2013). Post Keynesian en-dogeneity of money supply: Panel evidence. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 48?54. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00217-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00217-7
View in Google Scholar
Palley, T. I. (1994). Competing views of the money supply process: Theory and evidence. Metroeconomica, 45(1), 67?88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.1994.tb00013.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.1994.tb00013.x
View in Google Scholar
Phillips, P. C., & Shi, S. (2020). Real time monitoring of asset markets: Bubbles and crises. In Handbook of statistics (Vol. 42) (pp. 61?80). Elsevier.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.host.2018.12.002
View in Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. (2019). Do sterilized foreign exchange interventions create money? Journal of Asian Economics, 62, 1?16. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2019.03.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2019.03.001
View in Google Scholar
Rapih, S. (2021). How international capital inflows and domestic financial institu-tional development affect domestic credit: Evidence from developing coun-tries, Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 2007614. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2007614.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2007614
View in Google Scholar
Reinhart, C. M., & Reinhart, V. R. (2008). Capital inflows and reserve accumula-tion: The recent evidence. NBER Working Paper, 13842.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w13842
View in Google Scholar
Reis, R. (2016). Funding quantitative easing to target inflation. CFM Discussion Paper Series, CFM-DP2016-26.
View in Google Scholar
Reisenbichler, A. (2020). The politics of quantitative easing and housing stimulus by the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank, 2008?2018. West European Politics, 43(2), 464?484. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2019.1612160.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1612160
View in Google Scholar
Rey, H. (2016). International channels of transmission of monetary policy and the Mundellian trilemma. IMF Economic Review, 64(1), 6?35. doi: 10.1057/imfer.20 16.4 .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2016.4
View in Google Scholar
Rigobon, R., & Sack, B. (2003). Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 639?669. doi: 10.1162/003355 303321675473.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303321675473
View in Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1956). The accumulation of capital. London: Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar
Rodrigo, F., Bortz, P., & Colophon, N. Z. (2018). The politics of quantitative easing. A critical assessment of the harmful impact of European monetary policy on developing countries, SOMO. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/36967 301/The_politics_of_quantitative_easing_A_critical_assesment_of_the_harmful_impact_of_European_monetary_policy_on_developing_countries (08.01.2021).
View in Google Scholar
Rossi, S. (2019). The dangerous ineffectiveness of negative interest rates: The case of Switzerland. Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(2), 220?232. doi: 10.4337/roke.2019. 02.07.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2019.02.07
View in Google Scholar
Rüffer, R., & Stracca, L. (2006). What is global excess liquidity, and does it matter? European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 696.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.942737
View in Google Scholar
Ryan-Collins, J., Werner, R. A., & Castle, J. (2016). A half-century diversion of monetary policy? An empirical horse-race to identify the UK variable most likely to deliver the desired nominal GDP growth rate. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 43, 158?176. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2016.03.009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2016.03.009
View in Google Scholar
Sawyer, M. (2020). Endogenous money in an era of financialization. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 17(3), 356?366. doi: 10.433 7/ejeep.2020.0057.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2020.0057
View in Google Scholar
Senner, R., & Surbek, O. (2022). From the quantity theory of money towards the functional differentiation of credit: the role of non-GDP transactions in Ger-many, Italy and Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2022_ 10_21_senner.pdf (20.01.2023).
View in Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. (2016). Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865536
View in Google Scholar
Sieroń, A. (2019). Endogenous versus exogenous money: Does the debate really matter? Research in Economics, 73(4), 329?38. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2019.10 .003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2019.10.003
View in Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2012). The wealth of nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.
View in Google Scholar
Tchorek, G., Brzozowski, M., & Śliwiński, P. (2017). Determinants of capital flows to emerging and advanced economies between 1990 and 2011. Portuguese Eco-nomic Journal, 16(1), 17?48. doi: 10.1007/s10258-016-0126-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-016-0126-5
View in Google Scholar
Tori, D., & Onaran, Ö. (2018). The effects of financialization on investment: Evi-dence from firm-level data for the UK. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(5), 1393?416. doi: 10.1093/cje/bex085.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex085
View in Google Scholar
Weale, M., & Wieladek, T., (2016), What are the macroeconomic effects of asset purchases? Journal of Monetary Economics, 79(C), 81?93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.20 16.03.010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.03.010
View in Google Scholar
Werner, R. A. (1997). Towards a new monetary paradigm: A quantity theorem of disaggregated credit, with evidence from Japan. Credit and Capital Markets?Kredit und Kapital, 30(2), 276?309.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.30.2.276
View in Google Scholar
Werner, R. (2005). New paradigm in macroeconomics: Solving the riddle of Japanese mac-roeconomic performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506077
View in Google Scholar
Werner, R. (2012). Towards a new research programme on banking and the econ-omy ? implications of the quantity theory of credit for the prevention and res-olution of banking and debt crises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25, 94?105. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.06.002
View in Google Scholar
Werner, R. A. (2013). Towards a more stable and sustainable financial architec-ture?a discussion and application of the quantity theory of credit. Credit and Capital Markets?Kredit und Kapital, 46(3), 357?387. doi: 10.3790/ccm.46.3.357.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.46.3.357
View in Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1898). Interest and prices: A study of the causes regulating the value of money. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
View in Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (2004). Inflation targeting and optimal monetary policy. Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 86, 15?42. doi: 10.20955/r.86.15-42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/r.86.15-42
View in Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason: South-Western.
View in Google Scholar
Wray L. R. (1992). Commercial banks, the central bank, and endogenous money. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 14(3). doi: 10.1080/01603477.1992.11489900.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1992.11489900
View in Google Scholar
Yao, J., Ma, C., & He, W.P. (2014). Investor herding behaviour of Chinese stock market. International. Review of Economics and Finance, 29(1), 12?29. doi: 10.1016/ j.iref.2013.03.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.03.002
View in Google Scholar
Xiao, J., Juodis, A., Karavias, Y., Sarafidis, V., & Ditzen, J. (2022). Improved tests for Granger non-causality in panel data. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Pa-per, 114231.
View in Google Scholar
