Does income inequality matter for CO2 emissions in Russian regions?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.019Keywords:
climate change, CO2 emissions, income inequality, economic development, environmental Kuznets curveAbstract
Research background: Intensive economic growth in Russian regions during recent decades has been associated with numerous environmental issues, particularly increasing CO2 emissions, as well as income inequality. To achieve sustainable development, it is necessary to resolve these issues.
Purpose of the article: To shed light on the impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions based on Russian regional data covering the years 2004?2018.
Methods: Gini index and decile dispersion ratio are used to measure income inequality. To study the impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions in the Russian regions, we estimate econometric models with fixed and random effects and apply GMM method. We test the hypothesis of the environmental Kuznets curve to determine the impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions.
Findings & value added: The results show that CO2 emissions increase in tandem with growth in income inequality between 10% of people with the lowest income and 10% of people with the highest income. Simultaneously, CO2 emissions decrease with growth of Gini coefficient. The hypothesis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve was confirmed based on GMM method. Our findings underscore that the activities of the extraction and manufacturing sectors, as well as energy consumption, increase CO2 emissions. The chief significance of this paper is the finding that large income gap between extremely rich and extremely poor population cohorts increases CO2 emissions. This implies that economic policy aimed at reducing income inequality in Russian regions will also reduce CO2 emissions, especially if accompanied by increased use of environmentally friendly technologies. From the international perspective, our research can be extended to study other countries and regions.
Downloads
References
Al Mamun, M., Sohag, K., Hannan Mia, M. A., Salah Uddin, G., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 1?11. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.091
View in Google Scholar
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277?297. doi: 10.2307/2297968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
View in Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244?263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6
View in Google Scholar
Aye, G. C. (2020). Wealth inequality and CO2 emissions in emerging economies. The case of BRICS. United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research ? WIDER Working Paper, 161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2020/918-1
View in Google Scholar
Baloch, A., S. Z. Shah, Z. M. Noor, & H. B. Magsi (2018). The nexus between income inequality, economic growth and environmental degradation in Pakistan. GeoJournal, 83(2), 207?222. doi: 10.1007/s10708-016-9766-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9766-3
View in Google Scholar
Borghesi, S. (2006). Income inequality and the environmental Kuznets Curve. Environment. In M. Basili, M. Franzini & A. Vercelli (Eds.). Inequality and collective action. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
View in Google Scholar
Bowles, S., & Park, Y. (2005). Emulation, inequality, and work hours: was Thorsten Veblen right? Economic Journal, 115(507), F397?F412. doi: 10.1111/j.1 468-0297.2005.01042.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01042.x
View in Google Scholar
Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11(3), 169?178. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90198-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90198-8
View in Google Scholar
Boyce, J. K. (2008). Is inequality bad for environment? Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 15, 267?288. doi: 10.4337/9781782547679.000 09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-1152(07)15008-0
View in Google Scholar
Burakov, D., & Bass, A. (2019). Institutional determinants of environmental pollution in Russia: A non-linear ARDL approach. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 7(1), 510?524. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(36). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(36)
View in Google Scholar
Chancel, L., & Piketty, Th. (2015). Carbon and inequality: from Kyoto to Paris. Trends in the global inequality of carbon emissions (1998?2013) & prospects for an equitable adaptation fund. WID.world Working Paper Series, 2015/7.
View in Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Li, M., Xue, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Evaluation of effectiveness of China?s carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation. Energy Economics, 90(C). doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104872
View in Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353?377. doi: 10.2307/2118 443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
View in Google Scholar
Grunewald, N., Klasen, S., Martinez-Zarzoso, I., & Muris, C. (2017). The trade-off between income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions. Ecological Economics, 142, 249?256. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.034
View in Google Scholar
Hao, Y., Chen, H., & Zhang Q. (2016). Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China?s provincial panel data. Ecological Indicators, 67, 533?542. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.025
View in Google Scholar
Hartwell, C. A., Otrachshenko, V., & Popova, O. (2021). Waxing power, waning pollution: the effect of COVID-19 on Russian environmental policymaking. Ecological Economics, 184, 107003. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.1070 03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107003
View in Google Scholar
Ivanova, V. (2019). GRP and environmental pollution in Russian regions: spatial econometric analysis. Quantile, 14, 53?62.
View in Google Scholar
Jorgenson, A. K., Schor, J. B., & Huang, X. (2017). Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: a state-level analysis, 1997-2012. Ecological Economics, 134, 40?48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.016
View in Google Scholar
Kasuga, H., & Takaya, M. (2017). Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3689?3701. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.10.099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.099
View in Google Scholar
Ketenci, N. (2018). The environmental Kuznets Curve in the case of Russia. Russian Journal of Economics, 4(3), 249?265. doi: 10.3897/j.ruje.4.28482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/j.ruje.4.28482
View in Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1?28.
View in Google Scholar
Li, R., & Jiang, R. (2019). Is carbon emission decline caused by economic decline? Empirical evidence from Russia. Energy & Environment, 30(4), 672?684. doi: 10.1177/0958305X18802786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18802786
View in Google Scholar
Liu, C., Jiang, Y., & Xie R. (2019). Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission in the US? Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 380?387. doi: 10.1016/J.J CLEPRO.2019.01.242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.242
View in Google Scholar
Mariev, O. S., Davidson, N. B., & Emelyanova, O. S. (2020). The impact of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions in the regions of Russia. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 19(3), 286?309. doi: 10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3 .014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3.014
View in Google Scholar
Pao, H-T, Yu, H-C, & Yang, Y-H (2011). Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy, 36(8), 5094?5100. doi: 10.1016/j. energy.2011.06.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.004
View in Google Scholar
Podobedova, L. (2020, May 25). Russia has set a five-year record for air pollution. RBC. Retrieved from https://www.rbc.ru/business/25/05/2020/5ec6a0b39a79 47d276ceca8f (22.10.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Ravallion, M., Heil, M., & Jalan, J. (2000). Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxford Economic Papers, 52(4), 651?669. doi: 10.1093/oep/52.4.651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/52.4.651
View in Google Scholar
Rojas-Vallejos, J., & Lastuka, A. (2020). The income inequality and carbon emissions trade-off revisited. Energy Policy, 139, 1?10. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.1 11302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111302
View in Google Scholar
Slobodenyuk, E. D., & Mareeva, S. V. (2020). Relative poverty in Russia: evidence from different thresholds, social indicators research. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 151(1), 135?153. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02364-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02364-1
View in Google Scholar
Sohag, K., Mariev, O., & Davidson, N. (2021). Revising environmental Kuznets Curve in Russian regions: role of environmental policy stringency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 52873?52886. doi: 10.1007 /s11356-021-14515-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14515-z
View in Google Scholar
Theil, H. (1967). Economics information theory. Economic Journal, 79(315), 601?602. doi: 10.2307/2230396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2230396
View in Google Scholar
Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 2, 147?160. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
View in Google Scholar
Vornobytskyy, M. S., & Boyce, J. K. (2010). Economic inequality and environmgnal quality: evidence of pollution shifting in Russia. PERI, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Working paper series, 217.
View in Google Scholar
Wang, N., Zhu, H., Guo, Y., & Peng, Ch. (2018). The heterogeneous effect of democracy, political globalization, and urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in G20 countries: evidence from panel quantile regression. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194(1), 54?68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.092
View in Google Scholar
Wiesmeth, H. (2020). Systemic change: the complexity of business in a circular economy. Foresight and STI Governance, 14(4), 47?60. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.47.60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.47.60
View in Google Scholar
Xie, Q., & Liu, J. (2019). Combined nonlinear effects of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from a panel data partially linear additive model. Energy, 186, 1?13. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115868
View in Google Scholar
Xu, B. (2016). A quantile regression analysis of China's provincial CO2 emissions: Where does the difference lie? Energy Policy, 98, 328?342. doi: 10.1016/j.enpo l.2016.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.003
View in Google Scholar
Yang, X., Lou, F., Sun, M., Wang, R., & Wang, Y. (2017). Study of the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the economic growth of Russia based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Applied Energy, 193, 162?173. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.034
View in Google Scholar
Zemtsov, S., Barinova, V., Kidyaeva, V. M., & Lanshina, T. A. (2019). Ecological efficiency and sustainable regional development in Russia during the 20 years of resource-based growth. Economic Policy, 14(6), 1?30.
View in Google Scholar
Zheng, J., Zheng Mi, Zh., Coffman, D., Milcheva, S., Shan, Y., Guan, D., & Wang, Sh. (2019). Regional development and carbon emissions in China. Energy Economics, 81(C), 25?36. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
