Exchange-traded products in Germany: development and substitution of exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded commodities and exchange-traded notes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.031Keywords:
exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded products, financial innovations, stock exchange, GermanyAbstract
Research background: Exchange-traded products (ETPs) are one of the most rapidly growing categories of financial products. Their fast development has been boosted by innovative features. Three main categories of ETPs are exchange-traded funds (ETFs), exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) and exchange-traded notes (ETNs). ETCs and ETNs remain least known, even though their number on some stock exchanges is high. In Europe, Germany is one of the largest and most active ETPs markets. ETCs and ETNs are debt instruments, in contrast with the most popular ETFs, which are equity securities. Therefore, they offer investors different advantages, but also expose them to other types of risks.
Purpose of the article: The key aim of the article is to present the features of ETPs and to provide in-depth insight into the issues linked with the development of ETPs market in Germany, with the special emphasis on the ETCs and ETNs.
Methods: In the main empirical part of the article, German ETPs market is analyzed using descriptive statistics and technological substitution framework (employed for the analysis of innovations in order to evaluate the changing market shares of, first, ETFs versus ETCs and ETNs, as well as, second, ETFs versus other types of investment funds). The period of the analysis is 2010?2016 in the former case and 2007?2016 in the latter.
Findings & Value added: Share of ETPs other than ETFs in the total market in Germany remains low. Even though the market position of the leading products, i.e. ETFs, is still very strong, some substitution has been observed, especially after 2015. Predictions indicate that this trend will continue in the upcoming years. The results of the analysis of the investment funds? market confirm the substitution between ETFs and traditional investment funds over 2007?2017, in particular in the first years of this time period.
Downloads
References
Abner, D. (2016). The ETF handbook. How to value and trade exchange-traded funds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119 297727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119297727
View in Google Scholar
Agapova, A. (2011). Conventional mutual index funds versus exchange-traded funds. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2). doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2010.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2010.10.005
View in Google Scholar
Aroskar, R., & Ogden, W. A. (2012). An analysis of exchange traded notes tracking errors with their underlying indexes and indicative values. Applied Financial Economics, 22(24). doi: 10.1080/09603107.2012.684787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.684787
View in Google Scholar
Blitz, D., Huij, J., & Swinkels, L. (2012). The performance of European index funds and exchange‐traded funds. European Financial Management, 18(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x
View in Google Scholar
Charteris, A., Chau, F., Gavriilidis, K., & Kallinterakis, V. (2014). Premiums, discounts and feedback trading: evidence from emerging markets' ETFs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.010
View in Google Scholar
Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Frijns, B. (2017). Evaluating the tracking performance and tracking error of New Zealand exchange traded funds. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(3). doi: 10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0089
View in Google Scholar
Cherry, J. (2004). The limits of arbitrage: evidence from exchange traded funds. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=628061 (12.08.2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.628061
View in Google Scholar
Cserna, B., Levy, A., & Wiener, Z. (2013). Counterparty risk in exchange-traded notes (ETNs). Journal of Fixed Income, 23(1). doi: 10.3905/jfi.2013.23.1.076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2013.23.1.076
View in Google Scholar
Curcio, R. J., Lipka, J. M., & Thornton, Jr., J. H. (2004). Cubes and the individual investor. Financial Services Review, 13.
View in Google Scholar
Czuderna, K., Riedel, C., & Wagner, N. (2015). Liquidity and conditional market returns: evidence from German exchange traded funds. Economic Modelling, 51. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.028
View in Google Scholar
Dannhauser, C. D. (2017). The impact of innovation: evidence from corporate bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Journal of Financial Economics, 125. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.002
View in Google Scholar
Deutsche Bank (2010). The race for assets in the European commodity exchange-traded products space. London.
View in Google Scholar
Deutsche Bank (2015). European monthly ETF market review. London.
View in Google Scholar
Deutsche Bank (2017). ETF annual review & outlook. London.
View in Google Scholar
Elton, E., Gruber, M., Comer, G., & Li, K. (2002). Spiders: where are the bugs? Journal of Business, 75(3). doi:10.1086/339891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/339891
View in Google Scholar
ETFGI (2017). ETFGI global ETF and ETP industry highlights - December 2016. Retrieved from http://www.etfgi.com/publications/reports (22.03.2017).
View in Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (2009). The ETF book: the ETF book: all you need to know about exchange-traded funds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
View in Google Scholar
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2012). Investor alerts exchange-traded notes — avoid unpleasant surprises. Retrieved from http://www.finra.org/in vestors/alerts/exchange-traded-notes-avoid-surprises (20.03.2017).
View in Google Scholar
Fisher, J. C., & Pry, R. H. (1972). A simple substitution model of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80005-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80005-7
View in Google Scholar
Hill, J. M. (2013). The evolution and success of index strategies in ETFs. Financial Analyst Journal, 72(5). doi: 10.2469/faj.v72.n5.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v72.n5.2
View in Google Scholar
Hill, J. M., Nadig, D., Hougan, M., & Fuhr, D. (2015). A comprehensive guide to exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Charlottesville, VA: CFA Institute Research Foundation.
View in Google Scholar
Hilliard, J. (2017). Premiums and discounts in ETFs: an analysis of the arbitrage mechanism in domestic and international funds. Global Finance Journal, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2014.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2014.06.001
View in Google Scholar
Hull, I. (2016). The development and spread of financial innovations. Quantitative Economics, 7. doi:10.3982/QE521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE521
View in Google Scholar
Ivanov, S. I. (2016). Analysis of ETF bid-ask spread components. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 61. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.02.004
View in Google Scholar
Krause, T., & Tse, Y. (2013). Volatility and return spillovers in Canadian and U.S. industry ETFs. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.009
View in Google Scholar
Kucharavy, D., & De Guio, R. (2011). Logistic substitution model and technological forecasting. Procedia Engineering, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.129
View in Google Scholar
Kwaśnicki, W. (2013). Logistic growth of the global economy and competitiveness of nations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.007
View in Google Scholar
Lechman, E. (2015). ICT diffusion in developing countries. Towards a new concept of technological takeoff. Springer. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-319-18254-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18254-4
View in Google Scholar
Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2015). ICT technologies and financial innovations: the case of Exchange Traded Funds in Brazil, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.006
View in Google Scholar
Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2018). Tracing financial innovation diffusion and substitution trajectories. Recent evidence on exchange-traded funds in Japan and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.003
View in Google Scholar
Lettau, M., & Madhavan, A. (2018). Exchange-Traded Funds 101 for Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1). doi: 10.1257/jep.32.1.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.1.135
View in Google Scholar
Leung, T., & Santoli, M. (2016). Leveraged exchange-traded funds: price dynamics and options valuation. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29094-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29094-2
View in Google Scholar
Lin, J.-C. (2016). Does the inverse exchange-traded fund trading convey a bearish signal to the market?. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(2-2). doi:10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.02
View in Google Scholar
MacManus, C., & Lee, J. (2017). The growth of ETFs in Europe. Performance Magazine, 22.
View in Google Scholar
Madhavan, A. (2012). Exchange-traded funds, market structure, and the flash crash. Financial Analyst Journal, 68(4). doi: 10.2469/faj.v68.n4.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v68.n4.6
View in Google Scholar
Marchetti, C., & Nakicenovic, N. (1979). The dynamics of energy systems and the logistic substitution model. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
View in Google Scholar
Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2013). ETF arbitrage: intraday evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin. 2013.05.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.05.014
View in Google Scholar
Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2018). Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin. 2018.02.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.02.011
View in Google Scholar
Marszk, A., Lechman, E., & Kaur, H. (2017). Financial markets diffusion patterns. The case of Mexican investment funds. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i1.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i1.5
View in Google Scholar
Meyer, P. S., Yung, J. W., & Ausubel, J. H. (1999). A primer on logistic growth and substitution: the mathematics of the Loglet Lab software. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61(3). doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00021-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00021-9
View in Google Scholar
Petajisto, A. (2017). Inefficiencies in the pricing of exchange-traded funds. Financial Analyst Journal, 73(1). doi: 10.2469/faj.v73.n1.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v73.n1.7
View in Google Scholar
Shank, C. A., & Vianna, A. C. (2016). Are US-Dollar-Hedged-ETF investors aggressive on exchange rates? A panel VAR approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.05.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2782082
View in Google Scholar
Vandermarliere, B., Ryckebusch, J., Schoors, K., Cauwelsc, P., & Sornette, D. (2017). Discrete hierarchy of sizes and performances in the exchange-traded fund universe. Physica A., 469. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.084
View in Google Scholar
Xetra (2017). Monthly statistics Cash Market. Retrieved from http://www.deuts che-boerse-cash-market.com/dbcm-en/instruments-statistics/statistics/cash-mar ket-statistics/monthly-statistics-cash-market (20.03.2017).
View in Google Scholar
Yiannaki, S. M. (2015). ETFs performance Europe - a good start or not? Procedia Economics and Finance, 30. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01346-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01346-5
View in Google Scholar